There are numerous ways to value a firm. There are even more books written
on how to value a firm than there are valuation methods.
1 A review of different valuation methods is therefore understandably beyond the scope of this
book. We will, in this section, describe the venture capital valuation method
only.
2 Normally, when carrying out a business valuation, it is appropriate to
use a few different methods to assess robustness of the valuation figure to different methods.
3 As well, within any given valuation method, it is normal to
consider the robustness of the valuation result to assumptions underlying the
method. In the end, it is important to be transparent about the sensitivity of
the valuation results to alternative assumptions used in arriving at the valuation and to different valuation methods.
The difficulty with valuing venture capital –backed entrepreneurial firms lies
in the variability of the returns associated with venture capital investments. As
shown in Chapters 19 –21, for example (see also Cumming and MacIntosh,
2003a,b; Cumming and Walz, 2004; Cochrane, 2005; Cumming et al ., 2006;
Cumming, 2008), a significant percentage (often 20 to 30%) of investments
are written off. Hence, there is huge variability in returns and a massive scope
for valuation error. At best, therefore, valuation of venture capital investments
is an art and not a science.
One valuation method commonly used by venture capital fund managers is
known as the venture capital method. This method involves assumptions that
may on the surface seem rather arbitrary. A typical successful venture capital –
backed entrepreneurial firm has negative cash flows in the early years of
the life of the firm and thereafter positive cash flows (Chapter 1, Figure 1.2).
The venture capital fund manager first determines the life of the investment
before the exit event and the price at which the investment will be sold at that
future exit date. For example, if there is a projection about the firm’s earnings
in the exit year, then the sale price might be determined in reference to the
price earnings multiple of a typical firm in the same industry. The sale price or
“ terminal value ” is then discounted back to the day of first investment with
the formula in equation 22.1.
Discounted Terminal Value = Terminal Value / (1 + target rate)^years (22.1)
The target rate is the discount rate required by the venture capital fund. This
discount rate is critical to the valuation of the investment and varies depending
on various factors that are explained following. In practice, the discount rate
can be as large as 75%.
Venture capital funds do not own 100% of the firms in which they invest.
The venture capital fund’s valuation of the entrepreneurial firm must therefore
be adjusted to account for the fact that it will hold less than 100% ownership.
In the first step in making this adjustment, the venture capital fund calculates
the eventual ownership percentage that it will have at the time of exit, or the
“ Required Final Percent Ownership, ” as in equation 22.2.
Required Final Percent Ownership = Investment / Discounted Terminal Value
(22.2)
The second step in this adjustment accounts for the fact that over successive
financing rounds, investment syndication, and changes in the entrepreneurial
firm’s management team’s ownership percentage (e.g., through the issuance of
stock options), and so on, the venture capital fund’s ownership will get diluted.
The required current percentage ownership depends on the venture capital
fund’s retention ratio, or percentage of the investment that will be retained from
first investment round to final investment round. Consideration of the retention
ratio enables the venture capital fund to figure out what percentage of the firm
the venture capital fund must own at the date of initial investment to maintain
the required final ownership percentage at the date of exit so the venture capital
fund maintains enough equity in the firm to achieve the desired rate of return.
The calculation for the required current ownership is given by equation 22.3.
Required Current Ownership Percent = Required Final Percent Ownership / Retention Ratio
(22.3)
Consider the following example. Suppose you are employed at the Soprano
Venture Capital Fund, a hypothetical venture capital fund in New Jersey. Your
first assignment is to value the price per share for a$10 million investment in a
start-up green technology venture and to decide on what share of the firm you
should demand. You project the firm will have net income in Year 6 of $ 40
million. Similar profitable green ventures listed on stock exchanges are trading at an average price-earning ratio of 15. The firm currently has 400,000
shares outstanding. Tony, your boss, tells you that the Soprano Venture Capital
Fund requires a target rate of return of 80%. What is the appropriate price per
share, and how many shares do you require? The answer is obtained by following the steps in equation 22.3.
Notice in the preceding example that there is a problem associated with
using the average price-earnings ratios of existing publicly trading green technology firms. Private firms are illiquid relative to publicly listed firms on stock
exchanges, and typically an adjustment needs to be made downward (e.g., possibly by 20%) depending on the expected illiquidity of the private firm.
More generally, the main difficulty in this venture capital valuation method
involves the choice of discount rate. One justification for placing an arbitrarily high discount rate is the value-added advice provided by the venture capital fund manager. Empirical evidence has shown that more prestigious venture
capital funds in fact charge higher discount rates (Hsu, 2004). Entrepreneurs
are typically more than willing to accept inferior valuations from more prestigious venture capital funds because of the better advice they expect to receive,
as well as the access to better networks of legal and accounting advisors,
investments bankers, and other individuals and firms that will help the firm
succeed. Therefore, in the next section we present evidence on returns and
discuss how returns to venture capital fund investment vary systematically
depending on the characteristics of the venture capital fund, entrepreneurial
firm, transaction-specific issues, and legal and market conditions.